As you may remember, Rihanna was just named as the replacement-crotch for Armani, taking over from Megan Fox. I welcomed Rihanna because she 1) eats and 2) doesn?t have a cat-face that changes month after month, year after year because of so much surgical and Botox intervention. However, once I got sight of the Rihanna-Armani ads, I was disappointed. They put her in a dumb blonde wiglet, and she looked like crap, which proves to me that whoever is in charge of Armani?s ad campaigns is a total moron. So?with that in mind, check out Armani?s new Beauty 2011 Christmas Collection ads, with Megan Fox. Yes, while Megan was replaced at the spokescrotch of Armani?s underwear and jeans lines, she?s still the official cat-face of Armani beauty products, so these ads are designed to get you to buy Armani makeup for your lady friends for Christmas.
I have to say? these ads aren?t as spooky and alien-like as some of Megan?s previous ones. Maybe I?m just getting used to her Official 2011 Face, or maybe the Photoshop wizards were having an off day, but Megan actually looks recognizable in these ads. She also looks surprisingly Caucasian - in the last set, I could have sworn Megan was Asian. Still, there is something busted about Megan?s face. Just because it?s not as bad as it used to be, it?s not a significant improvement.
Photos courtesy of Dlisted, Megan?s fansite.
Written by Kaiser
Posted in Advertising, Megan Fox
- Martha Stewart's daughter says her mom made her wrap her own presents, never cooked [Evil Beet]
- Cheesy sweet trailer for The Vow starring Channing Tatum and Rachel McAdams [Lainey Gossip]
- The Kardashians realize they look like trannies [D-Listed]
- Maggie Gyllenhaal as an old lady [Go Fug Yourself]
- 50/50 review: it's awesome [Pajiba]
- Best celebrity pictures from September [Popsugar]
- Friendlys is going out of business [Gawker]
- This week in video trailers [Videogum]
- Ads that show why PETA sucks [Jezebel]
- Drunk Elle Macpherson [Celebslam]
41 Responses to ?Megan Fox?s cat-faced Christmas ads for Armani: not terrible, or still bad??
-
She looks lovely.
-
The top pic looks weird, like they widened her face or something. Her face is more narrow than that in real life. What?s funny is, in the top pic she reminds me of Shannen Doherty (and Megan is married to David Silver! Lol) I really do think Megan is the most gorgeous actress out there. More than Angelina, Halle, Charlize, etc.
-
What are you talking about? I didnt even recognize it was her when I first saw these pictures.
-
Not bad. Although, she looks like Shannen Doherty in the second shot.
-
In the top picture, Megan looks like a cross between Hedy Lamarr and Liz Taylor.
An improvement over the last photos for sure.
-
She?s beautiful and exotic. Very good choice for a NOW product advert. I agree with the cross between Heddy Lamar and Elizabeth Taylor. So much better and appealing to the shopper than those faux feminine shots.
-
She looks like a completely different person in all 3 of these pictures. And none of them look like the last pictures we saw of her. But all of these people are pretty! So that?s something, I guess?
-
she still super hot check out her interview with scott feinberg from sept 10
2011http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cWY5jrhnrc
i really like this interview she is very articulate and humble imo
-
Ugh, she looks like any other starlet out there. At least after her first round of surgeries she looked somewhat distinctive.
-
She is absolutely stunning. She has lost a lot of baby fat in her face since she was in her teens. It is completely normal. Nothing busted about her face - she looks better than pretty much anyone else in Hollywood.
-
WAY too much photoshop and she doesn?t even look like Megan Fox. Utter fail.
-
Her shoulders and arms in the first and third photos are photoshopped somehow. Especially the first photo! What is up with her armpit? Why does her shoulder slope off weird like that? And in the third photo, it looks like they shopped her shoulders to be closer together so that they look less broad. This chick is tiny as it is, did they really need to do that? Besides, it is so obvious. Maybe it?s my crotchetiness from years of recognizing bad plastic surgery and bad photoshop, but the obviousness that they somehow changed her perfectly normal shoulders and arms irritates me.
-
LOL! She?s missing her left shoulder in the 1st picture! And this is supposed to be ?Armani?. Ha!
-
I have always like Megan Fox. I don?t think what happened to her with Transformers was great but always believed she would bounce back. I always thought that Megan?s talk of lesbianism and all the other stupid stuff she said to show she was a badass was to please the teenage fanasty fan base and Bay and the studio. When promoting Jennifer?s Bodyshe was funny, self deprecating and cool. I have no hate for because she keeps to herself, does not know judges by their first name and we only hear from her when she has something to promote. I liked her more for not responding to Ladouche and Beyhole.
-
I didn?t recognize her in the first picture. I can kind of see it in the third picture, after I was told who she was. The second picture is the best.
She is so beautiful, I wish she hadn?t messed with her face!
-
Well Megan?s tattoo?s are shopped all off her body for these ad?s. Which is a positive. Since she really did pick goofy things to ink on her body.
But I think these are decent images of her. Yet, I agree there is no need to thin her out. She is tiny and does not need the extra 10 pounds shopped off her.
-
looks weird tbh. something looks off around her below nose-upper lip area and it?s not the photoshop.
-
also there?s a somewhat trashy aura to her which always makes her unsuitable for such glamorous ads? i can?t put my finger on it?
-
I think she looks amazing.
-
I normally recognize her even though it?s her cat face, but in this set it took me a while to confirm that it was her, hmmm.
-
I really did not recognize her in any of the pictures. I would have said ?pretty Russian model, kinda generic beauty?.
-
Nothing is sexier than a razor-sharp clavicle.*
*and by ?nothing,? I mean ?everything.?
-
She does not looks like herself at all. In the third picture she resembles Kristen Stewart a bit and in the first she has no right shoulder to speak of. She looks like a mannequin. It?s unsettling.
-
I love the third photo.
-
She?s got her arm up. The shoulder naturally disappears.
She looks lovely.
-
She?s a beautiful girl but they photoshopped the hell out of her face. It?s sad we are getting used to the people in these ads not even looking remotely human anymore. Look at her face ? she?s got no pores. She looks like a drawing. Why do they even use real people?
-
Thanks keith133, that was a great link. I watched the video and it really changed how I think of her.
-
The top pic is awful?.it?s again the morons who photoshopped it?..tragic.I don?t know who should take the blame here?
The idiots who photoshopped it?.
OR
The idiots who actually thought to release it.
However?..
The second is gorgeous
The third is really beautiful!
-
What the actual f is happening to her chest in the second picture? Photoshoppers have gone mad on this one!
-
there is a weird photoshop situation going on in the first pic with her collar bone/chest/armpit area.
-
She looks fine.
-
did not recognize her, but that?s not a compliment either since the pics are so fucking airbrushed.
they stretched her neck w/ photoshop and it looks stupid.
-
Well, I do think she is very pretty, but they waaay overdid the ?skin smoothing? on the photoshop. She looks like a REAL DOLL.
I?m also digging the creative ways they hid her hideous thumbs.
-
Awful.
And these photos don?t inspire me to want to buy their makeup either. Fail. -
I simply can?t believe that armani is going so budget; the photogs are ridic photoshopped and she?s no model, the great ones had at least some personality, she has no facial expressions because she has nothing inside; How can armani use her and yet maintain some sort of cache - i?d love to know what she and her handlers did to get this gig - there is no shortage of beautiful italian women.
-
I don?t know if it?s the lifeless expressions, the photoshop, the pose or a mix of all three but i don?t like those, except maybe the second one that is passable.
Her extreme beauty, youthfull freshness and candor doesn?t render so well in that photoshoot where she looks like she is 40 besides.
I don?t think that Megan is made to strikes glamourous pose, to sell glamourous high fashion products like Charlize or Jolie or Catherine Zeta Jones.
Megan would have been more suited as a model for a guess Jeans campaign, to catch her youthfull and more carefree expressions.
-
Very pretty. She looks stunning. I think the lip filler effect is fading though, because her mouth breather face is back.
-
Just fyi? I picked up the Armani Luminous Silk Foundation. In-style recommended it (a few months back), and I thought I?d give it a go. It?s really nice.
-
Stunning, but its hard to tell its Megan.
-
The third pic is the only one that even remotely resembles her. And the first one does have a weird armpit/arm thing going on.. Its like they got lazy with the rest of the pic. I don?t see her thumb! lol..
-
My only issue is,it?s nothing wrong with the photos but I thought Megan Fox was just as beautiful if not more before she got all this surgery. Anyone can take high end photos and look like a million bucks but when she is without her makeup when photographers catch her outside off the red carpet, she looks old and tired. She was beautiful as her self not this!
Leave a Reply
Celebitchy aims to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules. You must be 13 or older to comment. This site is not intended for anyone under 13.
Note: due to excessive spam, the .info domain had to be banned. Please do not post links or use an e-mail address from a .info domain.
By commenting you agree to our comment policy
Use the "Report this comment as spam or abuse" link to ask the moderators to delete a comment if it's offensive. If your comment disappears, it has been eaten by the spam filter. Please e-mail cbcomments at gmail.com to get it retrieved.
Get an icon next to your name by signing up for a free Gravatar
celebrity babies celebrity relationships celebrity couples celebrity photos celebrity gossip
No comments:
Post a Comment